CHAPTER V

Universal Masonry
I . FENCEFORTH the Masons of England were
no longer a society of handicraftsmen, but an association of men of all orders and every vocation, as also of almost every creed, who met together on the broad basis of humanity, and recognized no standard of human worth other than morality, kindliness, and love of truth. They retained the symbolism of the old Operative Masonry,’ its lan- guage, its legends, its ritual, and its oral tradition. No longer did they build churches, but the spiritual
1 Operative Masonry, it should be remembered, was not entirely dead, nor did it all at once disappear. Indeed, it still exists in some form, and an interesting account of its forms, degrees, symbols, usages, and traditions may be found in an article on “Operative Masonry,” by C. E. Stretton (Transactions Leicester Lodge of Research, 1909-10, 1911-12). The second of these volumes also con- tains an essay on “Operative Free-masons,” by Thomas Carr, with a list of lodges, and a study of their history, customs, and em- blems — especially the Swastika. Speculative Masons are now said to be joining these Operative Lodges, seeking more light on what are called the Lost Symbols of Masonry.
202 THE BUILDERS
temple of humanity; using the Square not to meas- ure right angles of blocks of stone, but for evening the inequalities of human character, nor the Com- pass any more to describe circles on a tracing-board, but to draw a Circle of goodwill around all man- kind.
Howbeit, one generation of men, as Hume re- marks, does not go off the stage at once, and an- other succeed, like silkworms and butterflies. No more did this metamorphosis of Masonry, so to name it, take place suddenly or radically, as it has become the fashion to think. It was a slow process, and like every such period the Epoch of Transition was attended by many problems, uncertainties, and difficulties. Some of the Lodges, as we have noted, would never agree to admit Accepted Masons, so jealous were they of the ancient landmarks of the Craft. Even the Grand Lodge, albeit a revival of the old Assembly, was looked upon with suspicion by not a few, as tending toward undue centraliza- tion; and not without cause. From the first the Grand Master was given more power than was ever granted to the President of an ancient Assembly; of necessity so, perhaps, but it led to misunderstand- ing. Other influences added to the confusion, and at the same time emphasized the need of welding the order into a more coherent unity for its wider service to humanity.
UNIVERSAL MASONRY 203
There are hints to the effect that the new Mason- ry, 1f so it may be called, made very slow progress in the public favor at first, owing to the conditions just stated; and this despite the remark of Ander- son in June, 1719: ‘Now several old Brothers that had neglected the Craft, visited the Lodges; some Noblemen were also made Brothers, and more new Lodges were constituted.” Stuckely, the antiquarian, tells us in his Diary under date of January, 1721 — at which time he was initiated — that he was the first person made a Mason in London for years, and that it was not easy to find men enough to perform the ceremony. Incidentally, he confides to us that he entered the order in search of the long hidden secrets of “the Ancient Mysteries.” No doubt he exaggerated in the matter of numbers, though it is possible that initiations were comparatively few at the time, the Lodges being recruited, for the most part, by the adhesion of old Masons, both Operative and Speculative; and among his friends he may have had some difficulty in finding men with an adequate knowledge of the ritual. But that there was any real difficulty in gathering together seven Masons in London is, on the face of it, absurd. Im- mediately thereafter, Stuckely records, Masonry “took a run, and ran itself out of breath through the folly of its members,” but he does not tell us what the folly was. The “run” referred to was almost
204. THE BUILDERS
certainly due to the acceptance by the Duke of Mon- tagu of the Grand Mastership, which gave the order a prestige it had never had before; and it was also in the same year, 1721, that the old Constitutions of the Craft were revised.
Twelve Lodges attended the June quarterly com-_ munication of the Grand Lodge in 1721, sixteen in September, twenty in December, and by April, 1723, the number had grown to thirty. All these Lodges, be it noted, were in London, a fact amply justifying the optimism of Anderson in the last paragraph of the Book of Constitutions, issued in that year. So far the Grand Lodge had not extended its jurisdic- tion beyond London and Westminster, but the very next year, 1724, there were already nine Lodges in the provinces acknowledging its obedience, the first being the Lodge at the Queen’s Head, City of Bath. Within a few years Masonry extended its labors abroad, both on British and on foreign soil. The first Lodge on foreign soil was founded by the Duke of Wharton at Madrid, in 1728, and regularized the following year, by which time a Lodge had been established at the East India Arms, Bengal, and also at Gibraltar. It was not long before Lodges arose in many lands, founded by English Masons or by men who had received initiation in England; these Lodges, when sufficiently numerous, uniting under Grand Lodges — the old Lodge at York, that
UNIVERSAL MASONRY 205
ancient Mecca of Masonry, had called itself a Grand Lodge as early as 1725. The Grand Lodge of Ire- land was created in 1729, those of Scotland* and France in 1736; a Lodge at Hamburg in 1737,’ though it was not patented until 1740; the Unity Lodge at Frankfort-on-the-Main in 1742, another at Vienna the same year; the Grand Lodge of the Three World-spheres at Berlin in 1744; and so on, until the order made its advent in Sweden, Switzer- land, Russia, Italy, Spain, and Portugal. Following the footsteps of Masonry from land to land is almost as difficult as tracing its early his- tory, owing to the secrecy in which it enwrapped
1The Grand Lodges of Ireland and Scotland, it may be added, were self-constituted, without assistance or intervention from Eng- land in any form.
2A deputation of the Hamburg Lodge initiated Frederick — afterwards Frederick the Great of Prussia—into the order of Masons at Brunswick, August 14, 1738 (Frederick and his Times. by Campbell, History of Frederick, by Carlyle, Findel’s History of Masonry). Other noblemen followed his example, and their zeal for the order gave a new date to the history of Masonry in Ger- many. When Frederick ascended the throne, in 1740, the Craft was honored, and it flourished in his kingdom. As to the interest of Frederick in the order in his later years, the facts are not clear, but that he remained its friend seems certain (Mackey, Encyclo- pedia). However, the Craft underwent many vicissitudes in Ger- many, a detailed account of which Findel recites (History of Masonry). Few realize through what frightful persecutions Masonry has passed in many lands, owing in part to its secrecy, but in larger part to its principle of civil and religious liberty. Whenever that story is told, as it surely will be, men everywhere will pay homage to the Ancient Free and Accepted Masons as friends of mankind.
206 THE BUILDERS
its movements. For example, in 1680 there came to South Carolina one John Moore, a native of Eng- land, who before the close of the century removed to Philadelphia, where, in 1703, he was Collector of the Port. In a letter written by him in 1715, he mentions having “‘spent a few evenings in festivity with my Masonic brethren.” * This is the first ves- tige of Masonry in America, unless we accept as authentic a curious document in the early history of Rhode Island, as follows: ‘This ye [day.and month obliterated] 1656, Wee mett att y House off Mor- dicai Campanell and after synagog gave Abram Moses the degrees of Maconrie.”* On June 5, 1730, the first authority for the assembling of Free- masons in America was issued by the Duke of Nor- folk, to Daniel Coxe, of New Jersey, appointing him Provincial Grand Master of New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania; and three years later Henry Price, of Boston, was appointed to the same office for New England. But Masons had evidently been coming to the New World for years, for the
1 This letter was the property of Horace W. Smith, Philadelphia. John Moore was the father of William Moore, whose daughter became the wife of Provost Smith, who was a Mason in 1775, and afterward Grand Secretary of the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania, and whose son was Grand Master of Masons in Pennsylvania in
1796 and 1797 (History of Freemasonry, by Hughan and Stillson). 2 Ibid, chapter on “Early American Masonic History.”
\
UNIVERSAL MASONRY 207
two cases just cited date back of the Grand Lodge of r7I7. } How soon Coxe acted on the authority given him is not certain, but the Pennsylvania Gazette, pub- lished by Benjamin Franklin, contains many refer- ences to Masonic affairs as early as July, 1730. Just when Franklin himself became interested in Masonry is not of record—he was initiated in 1730-31 “— but he was a leader, at that day, of everything that would advance his adopted city; and the “Junto,” formed in 1725, often inaccurately called the Leathern-Apron Club, owed its origin to him. In a Masonic item in the Gazette of Decem- ber 3, 1730, he refers to “several Lodges of Free- masons” in the Province, and on June 9, 1732, notes the organization of the Grand Lodge of Penn- sylvania, of which he was appointed a Warden, at the Sun Tavern, in Water Street. Two years later Franklin was elected Grand Master, and the same year published an edition of the Book of Constitu- tions — the first Masonic book issued in America.
1 Benjamin Franklin as a Free Mason, by J. F. Sachse. Oddly enough, there is no mention of Masonry by Franklin in his Auto- biography, or in any of his letters, with but two exceptions, so far as known; which is the more remarkable when we look at his Masonic career in France during the later years of his life, where he was actively and intimately associated with the order, even ad- vancing to the higher degrees. Never for a day did he abate by one jot his interest in the order, or his love for it.
208 THE BUILDERS
Thus Masonry made an early advent into the new world, in which it has labored so nobly, helping to lay the foundations and building its own basic prin- ciples into the organic law of the greatest of all republics.
II
Returning to the Grand Lodge of England, we have now to make record of ridicule and opposition from without, and, alas, of disloyalty and discord within the order itself. With the publication of the Book of Constitutions, by Anderson, in 1723, the platform and principles of Masonry became matters of common knowledge, and its enemies were alert and vigilant. None are so blind as those who will not see, and not a few, unacquainted with the spirit of Masonry, or unable to grasp its principle of lib- erality and tolerance, affected to detect in its secrecy some dark political design; and this despite the noble charge in the Book of Constitutions enjoining politics from entering the lodge — a charge hardly less memorable than the article defining its attitude toward differing religious creeds, and which it be- hooves Masons to keep always in mind as both true and wise, especially in our day when effort is being made to inject the religious issue into politics:
In order to preserve peace and harmony no private piques or quarrels must be brought within the door of
UNIVERSAL MASONRY 209
the Lodge, far less any quarrel about Religions or Na- tions or State-Policy, we being only, as Masons, of the Catholic Religion above mentioned (the religion in which all men agree); we are also of all Nations, Tongues, Kindreds and Languages, and are resolved against all Politics as what never yet conduced to the welfare of the Lodge, nor ever will. This charge has always been actively enjoined and observed; but especially ever since the Reformation in Britain or the dissent and secession of these Nations from the communion of Rome.
No sooner had these noble words been printed,’ than there came to light a secret society calling it- self the “truly Ancient Noble Order of the Gor- mogons,”’ alleged to have been instituted by Chin- Quaw Ky-Po, the first Emperor of China, many thousand years before Adam. Notice of a meeting of the order appeared in the Daily Post, September 3, 1723, in which it was stated, among other high- sounding declarations, that “no Mason will be re- ceived as a Member till he has renounced his noble order and been properly degraded.” Obviously, from this notice and others of like kind — all hint- ing at the secrets of the Lodges —the order was
1 This injunction was made doubly strong in the edition of the Book of Constitutions, in 1738. For example: “no quarrels about nations, families, religion or politics must by any means or under any color or pretense whatever be brought within the door of the Lodge . . . Masons being of all nations upon the square, level and plumb; and like our predecessors in all ages, we are resolved against political disputes,” etc.
210 THE BUILDERS
aping Masonry by way of parody with intent to destroy it, if possible, by ridicule. For all that, if we may believe the Saturday Post of October fol- lowing, “many eminent Freemasons” had by that time ‘“‘degraded themselves” and gone over to the Gormogons. Not “many” perhaps, but, alas, one eminent Mason at least, none other than a Past Grand Master, the Duke of Wharton, who, piqued at an act of the Grand Lodge, had turned against it. Erratic of mind, unstable of morals, having an in- ordinate lust for praise, and pilloried as a “fool” by Pope in his Moral Essays, he betrayed his fraternity — as, later, he turned traitor to his faith, his apes and his native land!
Simultaneously with the announcement that many eminent Masons had “degraded themselves” — words most fitly chosen — and gone over to the Gor- mogons, there appeared a book called the Grand Mystery of Freemasons Discovered, and the cat was out of the bag. Everything was plain to the Ma- sons, and if it had not been clear, the way in which the writer emphasized his hatred of the Jesuits would have told it all. It was a Jesuit * plot hatched
1 Masons have sometimes been absurdly called “Protestant Jes- uits,” but the two orders are exactly opposite in spirit, principle, purpose, and method. All that they have in common is that they are both secret societies, which makes it plain that the opposition of the Latin church to Masonry is not on the ground of its being a secret
UNIVERSAL MASONRY 211
in Rome to expose the secrets of Masonry, and mak- ing use of the dissolute and degenerate Mason for that purpose—tactics often enough used in the name of Jesus! Curiously enough, this was further made evident by the fact that the order ceased to exist in 1738, the year in which Clement XII published his Bull against the Masons. Thereupon the “ancient order of Gormogons” swallowed itself, and so disap- peared — not, however, without one last, futile ef- fort to achieve its ends.’ Naturally this episode stirred the Masons deeply. It was denounced in burning words on the floor of the Grand Lodge, which took new caution to guard its rites from treachery and vandalism, in which respects it had not exercised due care, admitting men to the order who were unworthy of the honor.
order, else why sanction the Jesuits, to name no other? The differ- ence has been stated in this way: “Opposite poles these two societies are, for each possesses precisely those qualities which the other lacks. The Jesuits are strongly centralized, the Freemasons only con- federated. Jesuits are controlled by one man’s will, Freemasons are under majority rule. Jesuits bottom morality in expediency, Freemasons in regard for the well-being of mankind. Jesuits rec- ognize only one creed, Freemasons hold in respect all honest con- victions. Jesuits seek to break down individual independence, Free- masons to build it up” (Mysteria, by Otto Henne Am Rhyn).
1¥For a detailed account of the Duke of Wharton and the true history of the Gormogons, see an essay by R. F. Gould, in his “Masonic Celebrities” series (A. Q. C., viii, 144), and more recently, The Life and Writings of Philip, Duke of Wharton, by Lewis Mel- ville.
212 THE BUILDERS
There were those who thought that the power of Masonry lay in its secrecy; some think so still, not knowing that its real power lies in the sanctity of its truth, the simplicity of its faith, the sweetness of its | spirit, and its service to mankind, and that if all its rites were made public today it would still hold the hearts of men.* Nevertheless, of alleged exposures there were many between 1724 and 1730, both anon- ymous and signed, and they made much ado, es- pecially among men who were not Masons. It will be enough to name the most famous, as well as the most elaborate, of them all, Masonry Dissected, by Samuel Prichard, which ran through three editions in one month, October, 1730, and called out a noble Defence of Masonry, written, it is thought, by An- derson, but the present writer believes by Desagul- iers. Others came later, such as Jachin and Boaz, the Three Distinct Knocks, and so forth. They had their day and ceased to be, having now only an an- tiquarian interest to those who would know the man- ners and customs of a far-off time. Instead of in- juring the order, they really helped it, as such things usually do, by showing that there must be something:
1Findel has a nobly eloquent passage on this point, and it tells the everlasting truth (History of Masonry, p. 378). His whole his- tory, indeed, is exceedingly worth reading, the more so because it was one of the first books of the right kind, and it stimulated re- search.
UNIVERSAL MASONRY 213
to expose since so many were trying to do it. But Masonry went marching on, leaving them behind in the rubbish of things forgotten, as it does all its back-stair spies and heel-snapping critics.
More serious by far was the series of schisms within the order which began in 1725, and ran on even into the next century. For the student they make the period very complex, calculated to bewil- der the beginner; for when we read of four Grand Lodges in England, and for some years all of them running at once, and each one claiming to be the Grand Lodge of England, the confusion seems not a little confounded. Also, one Grand Lodge of a very limited territory, and few adherents, adopted the title of Grand Lodge of al] England, while another’ which commenced in the middle of the century as- sumed the title of “The Ancients,” and dubbed the older and parent Grand Lodge “I'he Moderns.” Be- sides, there are traces of an unrecorded Grand body calling itself “The Supreme Grand Lodge,” * as if each were trying to make up in name what was lack- ing in numbers. Strict search and due inquiry into the causes of these divisions would seem to show the following results:
1A paper entitled “An Unrecorded Grand Lodge,” by Sadler (A. Q. C., vol. xviii, 69-90), tells practically all that is known of this movement, which merged with the Grand Lodge of London in 1776.
214 THE BUILDERS
First, there was a fear, not unjustified by facts, that the ancient democracy of the order had been in- fringed upon by certain acts of the Grand Lodge of 1717 —as, for example, giving to the Grand Mas- ter power to appoint the Wardens.* Second, there was a tendency, due to the influence of some clergy- men active in the order, to give a distinctively Chris- tian tinge to Masonry, first in their interpretations of its symbols, and later to the ritual itself. This fact has not been enough emphasized by our histo- rians, for it explains much. Third, there was the fur- ther fact that Masonry in Scotland differed from Masonry in England, in details at least, and the two did not all at once harmonize, each being rather te- nacious of its usage and tradition. Fourth, in one instance, if no more, pride of locality and historic memories led to independent organization. Fifth, there was the ever-present element of personal am- bition with which all human societies, of whatever kind, must reckon at all times and places this side
1 Nor was that all. In 1735 it was resolved in the Grand Lodge “that in the future all Grand Officers (except Grand Master) shall be selected out of that body” — meaning the past Grand Stewards. This act was amazing. Already the Craft had let go its power to elect the Wardens, and now the choice of the Grand Master was narrowed to the ranks of an oligarchy in its worst form—a queer outcome of Masonic equality. Three months later the Grand Stew- ards presented a memorial asking that they “might form themselves into a special lodge,” with special jewels, etc. Naturally this bred discontent and apprehension, and justly so.
UNIVERSAL MASONRY (215
of heaven. Altogether, the situation was amply conducive to division, if not to explosion, and the wonder is that the schisms were so few.
Ill
Time out of mind the ancient city of York had been a seat of the Masonic Craft, tradition tracing it back to the days of Athelstan, in 926 A. D. Be that as it may, the Lodge minutes of York are the oldest in the country, and the relics of the Craft now preserved in that city entitle it to be called the Mecca of Masonry. Whether the old society was a Private or a Grand Lodge is not plain; but in 1725 it assumed the title of the “Grand Lodge of All Eng- land,” — feeling, it would seem, that its inherent right by virtue of antiquity had in some way been usurped by the Grand Lodge of London. After ten or fifteen years the minutes cease, but the records of other grand bodies speak of it as still working. In 1761 six of its surviving members revived the Grand Lodge, which continued with varying suc- cess until its final extinction in 1791, having only a few subordinate Lodges, chiefly in Yorkshire. Never antagonistic, it chose to remain independent, and its history is a noble tradition. York Masonry was acknowledged by all parties to be both ancient and orthodox, and even to this day, in England and over
216 THE BUILDERS
the seas, a certain mellow, magic charm clings to the city which was for so long a meeting place of Masons.*
Far more formidable was the schism of 1753, which had its origin, as is now thought, in a group of Irish Masons in London who were not recognized by the premier Grand Lodge.” Whereupon they de- nounced the Grand Lodge, averring that it had adopted “new plans” and departed from the old landmarks, reverted, as they alleged, to the old forms, and set themselves up as Ancient Masons — bestowing upon their rivals the odious name of Moderns. Vater the two were further distinguished from each other by the names of their respective Grand Masters, one called Prince of Wales’ Masons, the other the Atholl Masons.* The great figure in the Atholl Grand body was Lawrence Dermott, to whose keen pen and indefatigable industry as its | secretary for more than thirty years was due, in large measure, its success. In 1756 he published its first book of laws, entitled Ahiman Rezon, Or Help to a Brother, much of which was taken from the
1 Often we speak of “the York Rite,” as though it were the old- est and truest form of Masonry, but, while it serves to distinguish one branch of Masonry from another, it is not accurate; for, strict- ily speaking, there is no such thing as a York Rite. The name is amore a tribute of reverence than a description of fact.
2 Masonic Facts and Fictions, by Henry Sadler.
3 Atholl Lodges, by R. F. Gould.
UNIVERSAL MASONRY 217
Irish Constitutions of 1751, by Pratt, and the rest from the Book of Constitutions, by Anderson — whom he did not fail to criticize with stinging satire, of which he was a master. Among other things, the office of Deacon seems to have had its origin with this body. Atholl Masons were presided over by the Masters of affiliated Lodges until 1756, when Lord Blessington, their first titled Grand Master, was induced to accept the honor — their warrants having been left blank betimes, awaiting the com- ing of a Nobleman to that office. Later the fourth Duke of Atholl was Grand Master at the same time of Scotland and of the Atholl Grand Lodge, the Grand Lodges of Scotland and Ireland being repre- sented at his installation in London.
Still another schism, not serious but significant, came in 1778, led by William Preston,* who after- wards became a shining light in the order. On St. John’s Day, December 27, 1777, the Antiquity
1 William Preston was born in Edinburgh in 1742, and came as a journeyman printer to London in 1760, where he made himseif conversant with the history, laws, and rites of the Craft, being much in demand as a lecturer. He was a good speaker, and frequently addressed the Lodges of the city. After his blunder of seceding had been forgiven, he was honored with many offices, especially the Grand Secretaryship, which gave him time to pursue his studies. Later he wrote the Freemason’s Callender, an appendix to the Book of Constitutions, a History of Masonry, and, most famous of all, Illustrations of Masonry, which passed through a score of editions. Besides, he had much to do with the development of the Ritual.
218 THE BUILDERS
Lodge of London, of which Preston was Master — one of the four original Lodges forming the Grand Lodge — attended church in a body, to hear a ser- mon by its Chaplain. They robed in the vestry, and then marched into the church, but after the service they walked back to the Hall wearing their Masonic clothing. Difference of opinion arose as to the reg- ularity of the act, Preston holding it to be valid, if for no other reason, by virtue of the inherent right of Antiquity Lodge itself. Three members objected to his ruling and appealed to the Grand Lodge, he foolishly striking their names off the Lodge roll for so doing. Eventually the Grand Lodge took the matter up, decided against Preston, and ordered the reinstatement of the three protesting members. At its next meeting the Antiquity Lodge voted not to comply with the order of the Grand Lodge, and, in- stead, to withdraw from that body and form an alli- ance with the “Old Grand Lodge of All England at York City,” as they called it. They were received by the York Grand Lodge, and soon thereafter ob- tained a constitution for a “Grand Lodge of Eng- land South of the Trent.” Although much vitality was shown at the outset, this body only constituted two subordinate Lodges, and ceased to exist. Hav- ing failed, in 1789 Preston and his friends recanted their folly, apologized to the Grand Lodge, reunited with the men whom they had expelled, and were
UNIVERSAL MASONRY 219
received back into the fold; and so the matter ended.
These divisions, while they were in some ways un- happy, really made for the good of the order in the sequel — the activity of contending Grand Lodges, often keen, and at times bitter, promoting the spread of its principles to which all were alike loyal, and to the enrichment of its Ritual * to which each contrib- uted. Dermott, an able executive and audacious an- tagonist, had left no stone unturned to advance the interests of Atholl Masonry, inducing its Grand Lodge to grant warrants to army Lodges, which bore fruit in making Masons in every part of the world where the English army went.? Howbeit,
1The history of the Ritual is most interesting, and should be written in more detail (History of Masoury, by Steinbrenner, chap. vii, “The Ritual”). An article giving a brief story of it appeared in the Masonic Monthly, of Boston, November, 1863 (reprinted in the New England Craftsman, vol. vii, and still later in the Bulletin of Iowa Masonic Library, vol. xv, April, 1914). This article is valu- able as showing the growth of the Ritual—as much by subtraction as by addition —and especially the introduction into it of Christian imagery and interpretation, first by Martin Clare in 1732, and by Duckerley and Hutchinson later. One need only turn to The Spirit of Masonry, by Hutchinson (1802), to see how far this tendency had gone when at last checked in 1813. At that time a committee made a careful comparative study of all rituals in use among Masons, and the ultimate result was the Preston-Webb lectures now generally in use in this country. (See a valuable article by Dr. Mackey on “The Lectures of Freemasonry,” American Quarterly Review of Freemasonry, vol. ii, p. 297.) What a pity that this Re- view died of too much excellence!
2 Military Lodges, by Gould; also Kipling’s poem, The Mother Lodge.
220 THE BUILDERS Pe
when that resourceful secretary and uncompromis- ing fighter had gone to his long rest, a better mood began to make itself felt, and a desire to heal the feud and unite all the Grand Lodges — the way hav- ing been cleared, meanwhile, by the demise of the old York Grand Lodge and the “Grand Lodge South of the Trent.” Overtures to that end were made in 1802 without avail, but by 1809 committees were meeting and reporting on the “propriety and practicability of union.” Fraternal letters were ex- changed, and at last a joint committee met, can- vassed all differences, and found a way to heal the schism.*
1 Among the articles of union, it was agreed that Freemasonry should consist of the three symbolic degrees, “including the Holy Royal Arch.” The present study does not contemplate a detailed study of Capitular Masonry, which has its own history and his- torians (Origin of the English Rite, Hughan), except to say that it seems to have begun about 1738-40, the concensus of opinion dif- fering as to whether it began in England or on the Continent (“Royal Arch Masonry,” by C. P. Noar, Manchester Lodge of Re- search, vol. iii, 1911-12). Lawrence Dermott, always alert, had it adopted by the Atholl Grand Lodge about thirty years before the Grand Lodge of England took it up in 1770-76, when Thomas Duck- erley was appointed to arrange and introduce it. Dermott held it to be “the very essence of Masonry,” and he was not slow in using it as a club with which to belabor the Moderns; but he did not originate it, as some imagine, having received the degrees be- fore he came to London, perhaps in an unsystemized form. Duck- erley was accused of shifting the original Grand Masonic word from the Third Degree to the Royal Arch, and of substituting an- other in its stead. Enough to say that Royal Arch Masonry is
UNIVERSAL MASONRY 221
Union came at length, in a great Lodge of Recon- ciliation held in Freemason’s Hall, London, on St. John’s Day, December 27, 1813. It was a mem- orable and inspiring scene as the two Grand Lodges, so long estranged, filed into the Hall — delegates of 641 Modern and 359 Ancient or Atholl Lodges — so mixed as to be indistinguishable the one from the other. Both Grand Masters had seats of honor in the Fast. The hour was fraternal, each side willing to sacrifice prejudice in behalf of principles held by all in common, and all equally anxious to preserve the ancient landmarks of the Craft—a most sig- . nificant fact being that the Atholl Masons had in- sisted that Masonry erase such distinctively Chris- tion color as had crept into it, and return to its first platform.* Once united, free of feud, cleansed of
authentic Masonry, being a further elaboration in drama, follow- ing the Third Degree, of the spirit and motif of old Craft Masonry (History of Freemasonry and Concordant Orders, by Hughan and Stillson).
1It is interesting to note that the writer of the article on “Masonry” in the Catholic Encyclopedia—an article admirable in many ways, and for the most part fair— makes much of this point, and rightly so, albeit his interpretation of it is altogether wrong. He imagines that the objection to Christian imagery in the ritual was due to enmity to Christianity. Not so. Masonry was not then, and has never at any time been, opposed to Christianity, or to any other religion. Far from it. But Christianity in those days —as, alas, too often now—was another name for a petty and bigoted sectarianism; and Masonry by its very genius was, and is, unsec- tarian. Many Masons then were devout Christians, as they are
222 THE BUILDERS
rancor, and holding high its unsectarian, non-par- tisan flag, Masonry moved forward to her great ministry. If we would learn the lesson of those long dead schisms, we must be vigilant, correcting our judgments, improving our regulations, and cultivat- ing that spirit of Love which is the fountain whence issue all our voluntary efforts for what is right and true: union in essential matters, liberty in every- thing unimportant and doubtful; Love always — one bond, one universal law, one fellowship in spirit and in truth!
IV
Remains now to give a glimpse — and, alas, only a glimpse — of the growth and influence of Mason- ry in America; and a great story it is, needing many volumes to tell it aright. As we have seen, it came early to the shores of the New World, long before the name of our great republic had been uttered, and with its gospel of Liberty, Equality, and Fra- ternity it helped to shape the institutions of this Continent. Down the Atlantic Coast, along the Great Lakes, into the wilderness of the Middle West and the forests of the far South — westward it
now —not a few clergymen — but the order itself is open to men of all faiths, Catholic and Protestant, Hebrew and Hindu, who confess faith in God; and so it wil! always remain if it is true to its principles and history.
UNIVERSAL MASONRY 223
marched as “the star of empire” led, setting up its altar on remote frontiers, a symbol of civilization, of loyalty to law and order, of friendship with school-house and church. If history recorded the unseen influences which go to the making of a na- tion, those forces for good which never stop, never tarry, never tire, and of which our social order is the outward and visible sign, then might the real story of Masonry in America be told.
Instead of a dry chronicle,’ let us make effort to capture and portray the spirit of Masonry in Amer- ican history, if so that all may see how this great order actually presided over the birth of the repub- lic, with whose growth it has had so much to do. For example, no one need be told what patriotic memories cluster about the old Green Dragon Tay-
1 As for the chronicle, the one indispensable book to the student of American Masonry is the History of Freemasonry and Con- cordant Orders, by W. J. Hughan and H. L. Stillson, aided by one of the ablest board of contributors ever assembled. It includes a history of Masonry in all its Rites in North, Central, and South America, with accurate accounts of the origin and growth of every Grand Lodge in the United States and British America; also ad- mirable chapters on Early American Masonic History, the Morgan Excitement, Masonic Jurisprudence, and statistics up to date of 1891 —all carefully prepared and well written. Among other books too many to name, there are the History of Symbolic Masonry in the United States, by J. H. Drummond, and “The American Ad- denda” to Gould’s massive and magnificent History of Masonry, vol. iv. What the present pages seek is the spirit behind this forest of facts.
224 THE BUILDERS
ern, in Boston, which Webster, speaking at Andover in 1823, called “the headquarters of the Revolution.” Even so, but it was also a Masonic Hall, in the “Long Room” of which the Grand Lodge of Massa- chusetts — an off-shoot of St. Andrew’s Lodge — was organized on St. John’s Day, 1767, with Joseph Warren, who afterwards fell at Bunker Hill, as Grand Master. There Samuel Adams, Paul Re- vere, Warren, Hancock, Otis and others met and passed resolutions, and then laid schemes to make them come true. There the Boston Tea Party was planned, and executed by Masons disguised as Mo- hawk Indians — not by the Lodge as such, but by a club formed within the Lodge, calling itself the Cau- cus Pro Bono Publico, of which Warren was the leading spirit, and in which, says Elliott, ‘the plans of the Sons of Liberty were matured.” As Henry Purkett used to say, he was present at the famous Tea Party as a spectator, and in disobedience to the order of the Master of the Lodge, who was actively present.”
As in Massachusetts, so throughout the Col- onies — the Masons were everywhere active in be- half of a nation “conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” Of the men who signed the Declaration of Inde- pendence, the following are known to have been
1For the full story, see “Reminiscences of the Green Dragon Tavern,” in Centennial Memorial of St. Andrew's Lodge, 1870.
UNIVERSAL MASONRY 225
members of the order: William Hooper, Benjamin Franklin, Matthew Thornton, William Whipple, John Hancock, Philip Livingston, Thomas Nelson; and no doubt others, if we had the Masonic records destroyed during the war. Indeed, it has been said that, with four men out of the room, the assembly could have been opened in form as a Masonic Lodge, on the Third Degree. Not only Washington,’ but nearly all of his generals, were Masons; such at least as Greene, Lee, Marion, Sullivan, Rufus and Israel Putnam, Edwards, Jackson, Gist, Baron Steuben, Baron De Kalb, and the Marquis de La- fayette who was made a Mason in one of the many military Lodges held in the Continental Army.’ If the history of those old camp-lodges could be writ- ten, what a story it would tell. Not only did they initiate such men as Alexander Hamilton and John Marshall, the immortal Chief Justice, but they made the spirit of Masonry felt in “times that try men’s souls” *—-a spirit passing through picket-lines, eluding sentinels, and softening the horrors of war.
1 Washington, the Man and the Mason, by C. H. Callahan. Jack- son, Polk, Fillmore, Buchanan, Johnson, Garfield, McKinley, Roose- velt, Taft, all were Masons. A long list may be found in Cyclo- pedia of Fraternities, by Stevens, article on “Freemasonry: Dis- tinguished Americans.”
2 Washington and his Masonic Compeers, by Randolph Hayden.
3 Thomas Paine, whose words these are, though not a Mason, has left us an essay on The Origin of Freemasonry. Few men have ever been more unjustly and cruelly maligned than this great patriot, who was the first to utter the name “United States,” and who, in-
$36 THE BUILDERS
Laying aside their swords, these Masons helped to lay wide and deep the foundations of that liberty under the law which has made this nation, of a truth, “the last great hope of man.” Nor was it an accident, but a scene in accord with the fitness of things, that George Washington was sworn into office as the first President of the Republic by the Grand Master of New York, taking his oath on a Masonic Bible. It was a parable of the whole peri- od. If the Magna Charta demanded rights which government can grant, Masonry from the first as- serted those inalienable rights which man derives from God the Father of men. Never did this truth find sweeter voice than in the tones of the old Scotch fiddle on which Robert Burns, a Master Mason, sang, in lyric glee, of the sacredness of the soul, and the native dignity of humanity as the only basis of society and the state. That music went marching on, striding over continents and seas, until it found embodiment in the Constitution and laws of this nation, where today more than a million Masons are citizens.
How strange, then, that Masonry should have been made the victim of the most bitter and baseless persecution, for it was nothing else, in the annals
stead of being a sceptic, believed in “the religion in which all men agree” — that is, in God, Duty, and the immortality of the soul.
UNIVERSAL MASONRY 227
of the Republic. Yet so it came to pass between 1826 and 1845, in connection with the Morgan ’* af- fair, of which so much has been written, and so little truth told. Alas, it was an evil hour when, as Gals- worthy would say, “men just feel something big and religious, and go blind to justice, fact, and reason.” Although Lodges everywhere repudiated and de- nounced the crime, if crime it was, and the Governor of New York, himself a Mason, made every effort to detect and punish those involved, the fanaticism
1 William Morgan was a dissolute, nondescript printer in Batavia, New York, who, having failed in everything else, thought to make money by betraying the secrets of an order which his presence pol- luted. Foolishly misled, a few Masons had him arrested on a petty charge, got him out of the country, and apparently paid him to stay out. Had no attention been paid to his alleged exposure it would have fallen still-born from the press, like many another before it. Rumors of abduction started, then Morgan was said to have been thrown into Niagara River, whereas there is no proof that he was ever killed, much less murdered by Masons. Thurlow Weed and a pack of unscrupulous politicians took it up, and the rest was easy. One year later a body was found on the shore of Lake On- tario which Weed and the wife of Morgan identified —a year after- ward! —she, no doubt, having been paid to do so; albeit the wife of a fisherman named Munroe identified the same body as that of her husband drowned a week or so before. No matter; as Weed said, “It’s good enough Morgan until after the election” —a char- acteristic remark, if we may judge by his own portrait as drawn in his Autobiography. Politically, he was capable of anything, if he could make it win, and here he saw a chance of stirring up every vile and slimy thing in human nature for sake of office. (See a splendid review of the whole matter in History of Masonry, by Hughan and Stillson, also by Gould in vol. iv of his History.)
228 THE BUILDERS
would not be stayed: the mob-mood ruled. An Anti-Masonic political party* was formed, fed on frenzy, and the land was stirred from end to end. Even such a man as John Quincy Adams, of great ~ credulity and strong prejudice, was drawn into the fray, and in a series of letters flayed Masonry as an enemy of society and a free state — forgetting that Washington, Franklin, Marshall, and Warren were members of the order! Meanwhile — and, verily, it was a mean while— Weed, Seward, Thaddeus Stevens, and others of their ilk, rode into power on the strength of it, as they had planned to do, de- feating Henry Clay for President, because he was a Mason — and, incidentally, electing Andrew Jack- son, another Mason! Let it be said that, if the Ma- sons found it hard to keep within the Compass, they at least acted on the Square. Finally the fury spent itself, leaving the order purged of feeble men who were Masons only in form, and a revival of Mason- ry followed, slowly at first, and then with great rapidity.
No sooner had Masonry recovered from this or- deal than the dark clouds of Civil War covered the land like a pall — the saddest of all wars, dividing a nation one in arts and arms and historic memories,
1Cyclopedia of Fraternities, by Stevens, article, “Anti-Mason- ry,” gives detailed account with many interesting facts.
UNIVERSAL MASONRY 229
and leaving an entail of blood and fire and tears. Let it be forever rembered that, while churches were severed and states were seceding, the Masonic order remained unbroken in that wild and fateful hour. An effort was made to involve Masonry in the strife, but the wise counsel of its leaders, North and South, prevented the mixing of Masonry with politics; and while it could not avert the tragedy, it did much to mitigate the woe of it — building rain- bow bridges of mercy and goodwill from army to army. ‘Though passion may have strained, it could not break the tie of Masonic love, which found a ministry on red fields, among the sick, the wounded, and those in prison; and many a man in gray plant- ed a Sprig of Acacia on the grave of a man who wore the blue. Some day the writer hopes to tell that story, or a part of it, and then men will under- stand what Masonry is, what it means, and what it can do to heal the hurts of humanity.’
1 Following the first day of the battle of Gettysburg, there was a Lodge meeting in town, and “Yanks” and “Johnny Rebs” met and mingled as friends under the Square and Compass. Where else could they have done so? (Tennessee Mason). When the Union army attacked Little Rock, Ark., the commanding officer, Thomas H. Benton— Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Iowa — threw a guard about the home of General Albert Pike, to protect his Masonic library. Marching through burning Richmond, a Union officer saw the familiar emblems over a hall. He put a guard about the Lodge room, and that night, together with a number of Con- federate Masons, organized a society for the relief of widows and
230 THE BUILDERS
Even so it has been, all through our national his- tory, and today Masonry is worth more for the sanc- tity and safety of this republic than both its army and its navy. At every turn of events, when the rights of man have been threatened by enemies obvi- ous or insidious, it has stood guard — its altar lights like signal fires along the heights of liberty, keeping watch. Not only in our own land, but everywhere over the broad earth, when men have thrown off the yoke of tyranny, whether political or spiritual, and demanded the rights that belong to manhood, they have found a friend in the Masonic order — as did Mazzini and Garibaldi in Italy. Nor must we be less alert and vigilant today when, free of danger of foes from without, our republic is imperiled by the negligence of indifference, the seduction of lux- ury, the machinations of politicians, and the shadow of a passion-clouded, impatient discontent, whose end is madness and folly; lest the most hallowed of all liberties be lost.
Love thou thy land, with love far-brought From out the storied past, and used
orphans left destitute by the war (Washington, the Man and the Ma- son, Callahan). But for the kindness of a brother Mason, who saved the life of a young soldier of the South, who was a prisoner of war at Rock Island, IIll., the present writer would never have been born, much less have written this book. That young soldier was my father! Volumes of such facts might be gathered in proof of the gracious ministry of Masonry in those awful years.
UNIVERSAL MASONRY 231
Within the present, but transfused Through future time by power of thought.
V
Truly, the very existence of such a great historic fellowship in the quest and service of the Ideal is a fact eloquent beyond all words, and to be counted among the precious assets of humanity. Forming one vast society of free men, held together by volun-
‘tary obligations, it covers the whole globe from Egypt to India, fromItaly toKngland, from America to Australia, and the isles of the sea; from London to Sidney, from Chicago to Calcutta. In all civilized lands, and among folk of every creed worthy of the name, Masonry is found —and everywhere it up- holds all the redeeming ideals of humanity, making all good things better by its presence, like a stream underflowing a meadow.” Also, wherever Masonry flourishes and is allowed to build freely after its divine design, liberty, justice, education, and true religion flourish; and where it is hindered, they suf- fer. Indeed, he who would reckon the spiritual pos- sessions of the race, and estimate the forces that make for social beauty, national greatness, and hu- man welfare, must take account of the genius of
1 Cyclopedia of Fraternities, by Stevens (last edition), articte, “Free Masonry,” pictures the extent of the order, with maps ‘and diagrams showing its world-wide influence. !
232 THE BUILDERS
Masonry and its ministry to the higher life of the race.
Small wonder that such an order has won to its fellowship men of the first order of intellect, men of thought and action in many lands, and every walk and work of life: soldiers like Wellington, Bliicher, and Garibaldi; philosophers like Krause, Fichte, and John Locke; patriots like Washington and Mazzini; writers like Walter Scott, Voltaire, Steele, Lessing, Tolstoi; poets like Goethe, Burns, Byron, Kipling, Pike; musicians like Haydn and Mozart — whose opera, The Magic Flute, has a Masonic motif; mas- ters of drama like Forrest and Edwin Booth; editors such as Bowles, Prentice, Childs, Grady; ministers of many communions, from Bishop Potter to Robert Collyer; statesmen, philanthropists, educators, jur- ists, men of science — Masons many,* whose names shine like stars in the great world’s crown of intel-
1 Space does not permit a survey of the literature of Masonry, still less of Masonry in literature. (Findel has two fine chapters on the literature of the order, but he wrote, in 1865, History of Mason- ry.) For traces of Masonry in literature, there is the famous chap- ter in War and Peace, by Tolstoi; Mon Oncle Sosthenes, by Mau- passant; Nathan the Wise, and Ernest and Falk, by Lessing; the Masonic poems of Goethe, and many hints in Wilhelm Meister; the writings of Herder (Classic Period of German Letters, Findel), The Lost Word, by Henry Van Dyke; and, of course, the poetry of Burns.
- Masonic phrases and allusions— often almost too revealing — are found all through the poems and stories of Kipling. Besides
UNIVERSAL MASONRY 233
lectual and spiritual glory. What other order has ever brought together men of such diverse type, temper, training, interest, and achievement, uniting them at an altar of prayer in the worship of God and the service of man?
For the rest, if by some art one could trace those invisible influences which move to and fro like shuttles in a loom, weaving the network of laws, reverences, sanctities which make the warp and woof of society — giving to statutes their dignity and power, to the gospel its opportunity, to the home its canopy of peace and beauty, to the young an en- shrinement of inspiration, and to the old a mantle of protection; if one had such art, then he might tell the true story of Masonry. Older than any living religion, the most widespread of all orders of men, it toils for liberty, friendship, and righteousness; binding men with solemn vows to the right, uniting them upon the only basis upon which they can meet without reproach—like those fibers running through the glaciers, along which sunbeams journey, melting the frozen mass and sending it to the val-
the poem The Mother Lodge, so much admired, there is The Widow of Windsor, such stories as With the Main Guard, The Winged Hats, Hal o’ the Draft, The City Walls, On the Great Wall, many examples in Kim, also in Traffics and Discoveries, Puck of Pook’s Hill, and, by no means least, The Man Who Would be King, one of the great short stories of the world.
234 THE BUILDERS
leys below in streams of blessing. Other fibers are there, but none is more far-ramifying, none more tender, none more responsive to the Light than the mystical tie of Masonic love.
Truth will triumph. Justice will yet reign from sun to sun, victorious over cruelty and evil. Finally Love will rule the race, casting out fear, hatred, and all unkindness, and pity will heal the old hurt and heart-ache of humanity. There is nothing in history, dark as much of it is, against the ultimate fulfilment of the prophetic vision of Robert Burns — the Poet Laureate of Masonry:
Then let us pray, that come it may — As come it will, for a’ that —
That man to man, thé world o’er Shall brothers be, for a’ that.