Preface

Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2007 with funding from
IVIicrosoft Corporation
http://www.archive.org/details/bookofdreamsghosOOIanguoft
;7^7
m^
Presented to the LIBRARY of the
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
by
Mrs. Cody
THE BOOK
DREAMS AND GHOSTS
By the same Author,
MODERN MYTHOLOGY. 8vo, 95.
CUSTOM AND MYTH : Studies of Early Usage and Beli f.
With 15 Illustrations. Crown 8vo, 3s. 6d.
HOMER AND THE EPIC. Crown 8vo, 95. net.
PICKLE THE SPY; or, the Incognito of Prince Charles. With 6 Portraits. 8vo, i8s.
ST. ANDREWS. With 8 Plates and 24 Illustrations in the Text by T. Hodge. 8vo, 15s. net.
LETTERS TO DEAD AUTHORS. Fcp. 8vo, 2s. td. net.
BOOKS AND BOOKMEN. With 2 Coloured Plates and 17 Illustrations. Fcp. 8vo, 2s. 6d. net.
OLD FRIENDS. Fcp. 8vo, 2s. td. net.
LETTERS ON LITERATURE. Fcp. 8vo, 25. 6d. net.
COCK LANE AND COMMON-SENSE. Crown Svo, 35. td.
ANGLING SKETCHES. With 20 Illustrations. Crown 8vo, 3s. 6d.
BAN AND ARRIERE BAN : A Rally of Fugitive Rhymes. Fcp. 8vo, 5s. net.
GRASS OF PARNASSUS. Fcp. Svo, 25. 6d. net.
BALLADS OF BOOKS. Edited by Andrew Lang. Fcp. 8vo, 6s.
A MONK OF FIFE: being the Chronicle written by Norman Leslie of Pitcullo, concerning Marvellous Deeds that befel in the Realm of France, 1429-31. With 13 Illustrations by Selwyn Image. Crown 8vo, 6s.
THE WORLD'S DESIRE. By H. Rider Haggard and And ew Lang. With 27 Illustrations. Crown 8vo, 3s. &i.
LONGMANS. GREEN, & CO., 39 Paternoster Row, London New York and Bombay.
THE BOOK
DREAMS AND GHOSTS
BY
ANDREW LANG
NEW EDITION
LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO.
39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON NEW YORK AND BOMBAY
ABERDEEN UNIVERSITY PRESS
) I
PREFACE.
The chief purpose of this book is, if fortune helps, to entertain people interested in the kind of narratives here collected. For the sake of orderly arrangement, the stories are classed in different grades, as they advance from the normal and familiar to the undeniably startling. At the same time an account of the current theories of Apparitions is offered, in language as free from technicalities as possible. Ac- cording to modern opinion eyery y^ ghost " is a ''hallucination," a false perception, the per- ception of something which is not present. -
fit has not been thought necessary to discuss the psychological and physiological processes involved in perception, real or false. Every "hallucination" is a perception, "as good and true a sensation as if there were a reaF object there. The object happens no^ to be there, that is all." ^ We are not here concerned with
^Principles of Psychology, vol. ii., p. 115. By Professor William James, Harvard College, Macmillan's, London, 1890. The physical processes believed to be involved, are described on pp. 123, 124 of the same work.
VI PREFACE.
\i- . . .
the visions of insanity, delirium, drugs, drink, remorse, or anxiety, but with ''sporadic cases of hallucination, visiting people only once in a lifetime, which seems to be by far the most frequent type". "These," says Mr. James, "are on any theory hard to understand in detail. They are often extraordinarily complete ; and the fact that many of them are reported as veridical, that is, as coinciding with real events, such as accidents, deaths, etc., of the persons seen, is an additional complication of the pheno- menon." ^ A ghost, if seen, is undeniably so far a " hallucination " that it gives the impression of the presence of a real person, in flesh, blood, and usually clothes. No such person in flesh, blood, and clothes, is actually there. So far, at least, every ghost is a hallucination, ''that,'' in the language of Captain Cuttle, *'you may lay to," without offending science, religion, or common-sense. And that, in brief, is the modern doctrine of ghosts.
The old doctrine of " ghosts " regarded them as actual "spirits" of the living or the dead, freed from the flesh or from the grave. This view, whatever else may be said for it, represents the simple philosophy of the savage, which may be correct or erroneous. About the time of
^ Op, cit., ii., 13a
PREFACE. VU
the Reformation, writers, especially Protestant writers, preferred to look on apparitions as the work of deceitful devils, who masqueraded in the aspect of the dead or living, or made up phantasms out of " compressed air ". The common-sense of the eighteenth century dis- missed all apparitions as " dreams " or hoaxes, or illusions caused by real objects misinterpreted, such as rats, cats, white posts, maniacs at large, sleep-walkers, thieves, and so forth. Modern science, when it admits the possibility of occasional hallucinations in the sane and healthy, also admits, of course, the existence of apparitions. These, for our purposes, are hallu- cinatory appearances occurring in the experi- ence of people healthy and sane. The difficulty begins when we ask whether these appearances ever have any provoking mental cause outside the minds of the people who experience them — any cause arising in the minds of others, alive or dead. This is a question which orthodox psychology does not approach, standing aside from any evidence which may be produced.
This book does not pretend to be a convincing, but merely an illustrative collection of evidence. It may, or may not, suggest to some readers the desirableness of further inquiry ; the author certainly does not hope to do more, if as much.
vili PREFACE.
It may be urged that many of the stories here narrated come from remote times, and, as the testimony for these cannot be rigidly studied, that the old unauthenticated stories clash with the analogous tales current on better authority in our own day. But these ancient legends are given, not as evidence, but for three reasons : first, because of their merit as mere stories ; next, because several of them are now perhaps for the first time offered with a critical discussion of their historical sources ; lastly, because the old legends seem to show how the fancy of periods less critical than ours dealt with such facts as are now reported in a dull un- dramatic manner. Thus (i) the Icelandic ghost stories have peculiar literary merit as simple dramatic narratives. (2) Every one has heard of the Wesley ghost, Sir George Villiers's spectre, Lord Lyttelton*s ghost, the Beresford ghost, Mr. Williams's dream of Mr. Perceval's murder, and so forth. But the original sources have not, as a rule, been examined in the ordinary spirit of calm historical criticism, by aid of a comparison of the earliest versions in print or manuscript. (3) Even ghost stories, as a rule, have some basis of fact, whether fact of hallucination, or illusion, or imposture. They are, at lowest, "human documents".
PREFACE. IX
Now, granting such facts (of imposture, halluci- nation, or what you will), as our dull, modern narratives contain, we can regard these facts, or things like these, as the nuclei which our less critical ancestors elaborated into their extra- ordinary romances. In this way the belief in demoniacal possession (distinguished, as such, from madness and epilepsy) has its nucleus, some contend, in the phenomena of alternating personalities in certain patients. Their char- acters, ideas, habits, and even voices change, and the most obvious solution of the problem, in the past, was to suppose that a new alien personality — a " devil " — had entered into the sufferer.
Again, the phenomena occurring in " haunted houses " (whether caused, or not, by imposture or hallucination, or both) were easily magnified into such legends as that of Grettir and Glam, and into the monstrosities of the witch trials. Once more the simple hallucination of a dead person's appearance in his house demanded an explanation. This was easily given by evolving a legend that he was a spirit, escaped from pur- gatory or the grave, to fulfil a definite purpose. The rarity of such purposeful ghosts in an age like ours, so rich in ghost stories, must have a cause. That cause is, probably, a dwindling of the myth-making faculty.
X PREFACE.
Any one who takes these matters seriously, as facts in human nature, must have dis- covered the difficulty of getting evidence at first hand. This arises from several causes. First, the cock-sure common-sense of the years from 1660 to 1850, or so, regarded every one who had experience of a hallucination as a dupe, a lunatic, or a liar. In this healthy state of opinion, eminent people like Lord Brougham kept their experience to themselves, or, at most, nervously protested that they *' were sure it was only a dream ". Next, to tell the story was, often, to enter on a narrative of inti- mate, perhaps painful, domestic circumstances. Thirdly, many persons now refuse information as a matter of "principle," or of "religious principle," though it is difficult to see where either principle or religion is concerned, if the witness is telling what he believes to be true. Next, some devotees of science aver that these studies may bring back faith by a side wind, and, with faith, the fires of Smithfield and the torturing of witches. These opponents are what Professor Huxley called ^' dreadful con- sequences argufiers," when similar reasons were urged against the doctrine of evolution. Their position is strongest when they maintain that these topics have a tendency to befog the
PREFACE. XI
intellect. A desire to prove the existence of " new forces " may beget indifference to logic and to the laws of evidence. This is true, and we have several dreadful examples among men otherwise scientific. But all studies have their temptations. Many a historian, to prove the guilt or innocence of Queen Mary, has put evidence, and logic, and common honesty far from him. Yet this is no reason for abandoning the study of history.
There is another class of difficulties. As an- thropology becomes popular, every inquirer knows what customs he ought to find among savages, so, of course, he finds them. In the same way, people may now know what customs it is orthodox to find among ghosts, and may pretend to find them, or may simulate them by imposture. The white sheet and clanking chains are forsaken for a more realistic rendering of the ghostly part. The desire of social notoriety may beget wanton fabrications. In short, all studies have their perils, and these are among the dangers which beset the path of the inquirer into things ghostly. He must adopt the stoical maxim : ^* Be sober and do not believe " — in a hurry.
If there be truth in even one case of ** tele- pathy," it will follow that the human soul is a thing endowed with attributes not yet recognised
xil PREFACE,
by science. It cannot be denied that this is a serious consideration, and that very startling consequences might be deduced from it ; such beliefs, indeed, as were generally entertained in the ages of Christian darkness which pre- ceded the present era of enlightenment. But our business in studies of any kind is, of course, with truth, as we are often told, not with the con- sequences, however ruinous to our most settled convictions, or however pernicious to society.
The very opposite objection comes from the side of religion. These things we learn, are spiritual mysteries into which men must not inquire. This is only a relic of the ancient opinion that he was an impious character who first launched a boat,^ God having made man a terrestrial animal. Assuredly God put us into a world of phenomena, and gave us inquiring minds. We have as much right to explore the phenomena of these minds as to explore the ocean. Again, if it be said that our inquiries may lead to an undignified theory of the future life (so far they have not led to any theory at all), that, also, is the position of the Dreadful Consequences Argufier. Lastly, *'the stories may frighten children ". For children the book is not written, any more than if it were a treatise on comparative anatomy.
PREFACE. XUI
The author has frequently been asked, both pubHcly and privately : ^' Do you believe in ghosts ? " One can only answer : ** How do you define a ghost?" I do believe, with all students of human nature, in hallucinations of one, or of several, or even of all the senses. But as to whether such hallucinations, among the sane, are ever caused by psychical influences from the minds of others, alive or dead, not communicated through the ordinary channels of sense, my mind is in a balance of doubt. It is a question of evidence.
In this collection many stories are given without the real names of the witnesses. In most of the cases the real names, and their owners, are well known to myself In not pub- lishing the names I only take the common privilege of writers on medicine and psychology. In other instances the names are known to the managers of the Society for Psychical Research, who have kindly permitted me to borrow from their collections.
While this book passed through the press, a long correspondence called " On the Trail of a Ghost " appeared in The Times. It illustrated the copious fallacies which haunt the human intellect. Thus it was maintained by some persons, and denied by others, that sounds of
XIV PREFACE.
unknown origin were occasionally heard in a certain house. These, it was suggested, might (if really heard) be caused by slight seismic disturbances. Now many people argue, " Blunderstone House is not haunted, for I passed a night there, and nothing unusual occurred ". Apply this to a house where noises are actually caused by young earthquakes. Would anybody say : " There are no seismic disturbances near Blunderstone House, for I passed a night there, and none occurred " ? Why should a noisy ghost (if there is such a thing) or a hallucinatory sound (if there is such a thing), be expected to be more punctual and pertinacious than a seismic disturbance ? Again, the gentleman who opened the correspondence with a long statement on the negative side, cried out, like others, for scientific publicity, for names of people and places. But neither he nor his allies gave their own names. He did not precisely establish his claim to confidence by publishing his version of private conversations. Yet he expected science and the public to believe his anonymous account of a conver- sation, with an unnamed person, at which he did not and could not pretend to have been present. He had a theory of sounds heard by himself which could have been proved, or
PREFACE. XV
disproved, in five minutes, by a simple ex- periment. But that experiment he does not say that he made.
This kind of evidence is thought good enough on the negative side. It certainly would not be accepted by any sane person for the affirmative side. If what is called psychical research has no other results, at least it enables us to perceive the fallacies which can impose on the credulity of common-sense.
In preparing this collection of tales, I owe much to Mr. W. A. Craigie, who translated the stories from the Gaelic and the Icelandic ; to Miss Elspeth Campbell, who gives a version of the curious Argyll tradition of Ticonderoga (rhymed by Mr. Robert Louis Stevenson, who put a Cameron where a Campbell should be) ; to Miss Violet Simpson, who found the Wind- ham MS. about the Duke of Buckingham's story, and made other researches ; and to Miss Goodrich Freer, who pointed out the family version of " The Tyrone Ghost ".
CONTENTS.