book could not have been written before Jerusalem had

been taken. The reader will recollect the quotation I have just before made from the 15th chapter of Joshua, ver. 63, where it is said that the Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem unto this day^ meaning the time when the book of Joshua was written.
The evidence I have already produced to prove that the books I have hitherto treated of were not written by the persons to whom they are ascribed, nor till many years after their death, if such persons ever lived, is already so abundant that I can afford to admit this passage with less weight than I am entitled to draw from it. For the case is, that so far as the Bible can be credited as a history, the city of Jerusalem was not taken till the time of David ; and consequently that the books of Joshua and of Judges were not written till after the commencement of the reign of David, which was 370 years after the death of Joshua.
The name of the city that was afterward called Jeru- salem was originally Jebus, or Jebusi, and was the capital of the Jebusites. The account of David's taking this city is given in II. Samuel, chap. v. , ver. 4, etc. ; also in I. Chron. chap, xiv., ver. 4, etc. There is no mention in any part of the Bible that it was ever taken before, nor any account that favors such an opinion. It is not said, either in Samuel or in Chronicles, that they utterly de- stroyed men^ womeft and children ; that they left not a soul to breathe^ as is said of their other conquests ; and the silence here observed implies that it was taken by capitulation, and that the Jebusites, the native inhab-
AGE OF REASON. 99
itants, continued to live in the place after it was taken. The account, therefore, given in Joshua, that the Jebu- sites dwell with the children ofjudah at Jerusalem unto this day corresponds to no other time than after the taking of the city by David.
Having now shown that every book in the Bible, from Genesis to Judges, is without authenticity, I come to the book of Ruth, an idle, bungling story, foolishly told, no- ' body knows by whom, about a strolling countr\^-girl creeping slyly to bed with her cousin Boaz. Pretty stuff indeed to be called the word of God ! It is, however, one of the best books in the Bible, for it is free from murder and rapine.
I come next to the two books of Samuel, and to show that those books were not written by Samuel, nor till a great length of time after the death of Samuel ; and that they are, like all the former books, anonymous and with- out authority.
To be convinced that these books have been written much later than the time of Samuel, and consequently not by him, it is only necessary to read the account which the writer gives of Saul going to seek his father's asses, and of his interview with Samuel, of whom Saul went to inquire about those lost asses, as foolish people nowadays go to a conjuror to inquire after lost things.
The writer, in relating this story of Saul, Sam^uel and the asses, does not tell it as a thing that had just then happened, but as an ancient story in the time this zariter lived; for he tells it in the language or terms used at the time that Sajmiel lived, which obliges the writer to ex- plain the story in the terms or language used in the time the writer lived.
Samuel, in the account given of him, in the first of those books, chap ix., is called the seer ; and it is by this term that Saul inquires after him, ver. 11, "x'lnd as they (Saul and his servant) went up the hill to the city, they
ooan2B
lOO AGE OF REASON.
found young- maidens going out to draw water ; and they said unto them, Is the seer here .^" Saul then went ac- cording to the direction of these maidens, and met Sam- uel without knowing him, and said unto him, ver. i8, "Tell me, I pray thee, where the seer' s house is? and Samuel answered Saul, and said, I am the seer.^''
As the writer of the book of Samuel relates these ques- tions and answers, in the language or manner of speaking used in the time they are said to have been spoken, and as that manner of speaking was out of use when this author wrote, he found it necessary, in order to make the story understood, to explain the terms in which these questions and answers are spoken ; and he does this in the 9th verse, when he says ^^ Before -time^ in Israel, when a man went to inquire of God, thus he spake. Come, and let us go to the seer ; for he that is now called a Prophet, was before-time called a Seer." This proves, as I have before said, that this story of Saul, Samuel and the asses, was an ancient story at the time the book of Samuel was written, and consequently that Samuel did not write it, and that that book is without authenticity.
But if we go further into those books the evidence is still more positive that Samuel is not the writer of them ; for they relate things that did not happen till several years after the death of Samuel. Samuel died before Saul ; for the ist Samuel, chap, xxviii. , tells that Saul and the witch of Endor conjured Samuel up after he was dead ; yet the history of the matters contained in those books is extended through the remaining part of Saul's life, and to the latter end of the life of David, who suc- ceeded Saul. The account of the death and burial of Samuel (a thing which he could not write himself) is re- lated in the 25th chapter of the first book of Samuel, and the chronology affixed to this chapter makes this to be 1060 years before Christ ; yet the history of this first