BOOK I CH. XI § 26. 107

though this reading is supported by all the mss, yet most of the later editors have followed Rigalt and Davies in substituting motum for modum, in order to suit the following motum sensui junctum. In confirmation of this emendation they quote Arist. Phys. vil 1, @yolv ’A. pod mavrov évrav Kal Apepotytav kiynow éuroijoat Tov voov, but as Bouhier, Heind. and Lengnick point out, the original motion by which the cognate par- ticles were brought together was certainly not accompanied by feeling, and therefore cannot be alluded to in C’s phrase m. s.7. In the Acad. 11 118