CHAPTER V X

THE OUTCOME OF ALCHEMY
§ 61. The alchemists were untiring in their search X
for the Stone of the Philosophers, and we may well
ask whether they ever succeeded in
Alchemists effecting a real transmutation. That
achieve the many apparent transmutations occurred,
"Magnum ^^ observers beinsf either self-deceived Opus"? , r . 1 . .
by a superficial exammation — certam
alloys resemble the " noble metals " — or de- liberately cheated by impostors, is of course un- doubted. But at the same time we must not assume that, because we know not the method now, real transmutations have never taken place. Modern research indicates that it may be possible to transmute other metals (more especially silver) into gold, and consequently we must admit the possibility that amongst the many experiments carried out, a real transmutation was effected. On the other hand, the method which is suggested by the recent researches in question could not possibly have been known to the alchemists or accidentally employed by them ; and, moreover, the quantity of gold which is hoped for, should such a method prove successful, is far below the smallest amount that would have been detected in
7 81
82 ALCHEMY [§ 62
the days of Alchemy. But if there be one method
whereby the metals may be fctnsmuted, there may be
other methods. And it is not altogether an easy task
to explain away the testimony of eminent men such
as were van Helmont and Helvetius.
§ 62. John Baptist van Helmont (see § 57), who
was celebrated alike for his skill as a physician and
chemist and for his nobility of character,
Thr Testi- testified in more than one place that he luony of van 1,1. , r • i ^
Helmont. ^^^ nimselt carried out the transmutation
of mercury into gold. But, as we have mentioned above, the composition of the Stone em- ployed on these occasions was unknown to him. He says : " ... For truly, I have divers times seen it [the Stone of the Philosophers], and handled it with my hands : but it was of colour, such as is in Saffron in its Powder, yet weighty, and shining like unto powdered Glass : There was once given unto me one fourth part of one Grain : But I call a Grain the six hundredth part of one Ounce : This quarter of one Grain therefore, being rouled up in Paper, I pro- jected upon eight Ounces of Quick-silver made hot in a Crucible ; and straightway all the Quick-silver, with a certain degree of Noise, stood still from flowing, and being congealed, setled like unto a yellow Lump : but after pouring it out, the Bellows blowing, there were found eight Ounces, and a little less than eleven Grains [eight Ounces less eleven Grains] of the purest Gold : Therefore one only Grain of that Powder, had trans- changed 19186 [19 1 56] Parts of Quick-silver, equal to itself, into the best Gold.''^
' J. B. VAN Helmont : Zt/a Eternal (see Oriatrike, translated by J. C, 1662; or Van Hdmonfs WorkeSy translated by J. C, 1664,
§ 63] THE OUTCOME OF ALCHEMY 83
And again : *' I am constrained to believe that there is the Stone which makes Gold, and which makes Silver ; because I have at distinct turns, made pro- jection with my hand, of one grain of the Powder, upon some thousand grains of hot Quick-silver ; and the buisiness succeeded in the Fire, even as Books do promise ; a Circle of many People standing by, together with a tickling Admiration of us all. . . . He who first gave me the Gold-making Powder, had likewise also, at least as much of it, as might be sufficient for changing two hundred thousand Pounds of Gold : , . . For he gave me perhaps half a grain of that Powder, and nine ounces and three quarters of Quick-silver were thereby transchanged : But that Gold, a strange man [a stranger], being a Friend of one evenings acquaintance, gave me."^
§ 63. John Frederick Helvetius (see plate 13), an
eminent doctor of medicine, and physician to the
Prince of Orange, published at the Hague
The Testi- jj^ j^^^ ^^^^ following remarkable account
Helvetius. ^^ ^ transmutation he claimed to have effected. Certain points of resemblance between this account and that of van Helmont {e.^., in each case the Stone is described as a glassy substance of a pale yellow colour) are worth noticing: ** On the 27 December, 1666, in the forenoon, there came to my house a certain man, who was a complete stranger to me, but of an honest, grave countenance, and an authoritative
which is merely the former work with a new title-page and pre- liminary matter, pp. 751 and 752).
= J. B. VAN Helmont : I/ie Tree of Life (see Oriatrike or Van Helmonfs Workes^ p. 807).
84 ALCHEMY [§ 63
mien, clothed In a simple garb like that of a Mem- nonlte . . .
''After we had exchanged salutations, he asked me whether he might have some conversation with me. He wished to say something to me about the Pyro- technic Art, as he had read one of my tracts (directed against the sympathetic Powder of Dr. DIgby), in which I hinted a suspicion whether the Grand Arcanum of the Sages was not after all a gigantic hoax. He^ therefore, took that opportunity of asking me whether I could not believe that such a grand mystery might exist in the nature of things, by means of which a physician could restore any patient whose vitals were not Irreparably destroyed. I answered : ' Such a Medicine would be a most desirable acquisition for any physician ; nor can any man tell how many secrets there may be hidden in Nature ; yet, though I have read much about the truth of this Art, It has never been my good fortune to meet with a real Master of the Alchemical Science.' I also enquired whether he was a medical man. ... In reply, he . . . described himself as a brassfounder. . . . After some further conversation, the Artist Ellas (for it was he) thus addressed me : ' Since you have read so much in the works of the Alchemists about this Stone, Its sub- stance. Its colour, and Its wonderful effects, may I be allowed the question, whether you have not yourself prepared it ? ' Gn my answering his question in the negative, he took out of his bag a cunningly-worked ivory box, in which there were three large pieces of a substance resembling glass, or pale sulphur, and informed me that here was enough of the Tincture for the production of 20 tons of gold. When I
PLATE 13.
lOHANNES FRIDERICTJ5 HeEVETIUS.
Anhaltinv^ Cothonensk Doctor^'
Pra^cticus M^edLUn^ Haqa, Comttis . &i lo.A'.fSd.
§ 64] THE OUTCOME OF ALCHEMY 85
had held the precious treasure in my hand for a
quarter of an hour (during which time I Hstened to
a recital of its wonderful curative properties), I was
compelled to restore it to its owner, which I could not
help doing with a certain degree of reluctance. After
thanking him for his kindness in shewing it to me,
I then asked how it was that his Stone did not display
that ruby colour, which I had been taught to regard
as characteristic of the Philosopher's Stone. He
replied that the colour made no difference, and that
the substance was sufficiently mature for all practical
purposes. My request that he would give me a piece
of his Stone (though it were no larger than a coriander
seed), he somewhat brusquely refused, adding, in a
milder tone, that he could not give it me for all
the wealth I possessed, and that not on account of
its great preciousness, but for some other reason which
it was not lawful for him to divulge ; . . .
§ 65. '* When my strange visitor had concluded his
narrative, I besought him to give me a proof of his
_ , ^. assertion, by performing^ the transmuta-
Helvetms . ^ ^ , .
obtains the tory operation on some metals m my
Philosopher's presence. He answered evasively, that Stone. j^^ could not do so then, but that he would return in three weeks, and that, if he was then at liberty to do so, he would shew me some- thing that would make me open my eyes. He appeared punctually to the promised day, and invited me to take a walk with him, in the course of which we discoursed profoundly on the secrets of Nature in fire, though I noticed that my companion was very chary in imparting information about the Grand Arcanum. . - . At last I asked him point-blank to show me
86 ALCHEMY [§ 64
the transmutation of metals. I besought him to come and dine with me, and to spend the night at my house ; I entreated ; I expostulated ; but in vain. He remained firm. I reminded him of his promise. He retorted that his promise had been conditional upon his being permitted to reveal the secret to me. At last, how- ever, I prevailed upon him to give me a piece of his precious Stone — a piece no larger than a grain of rape seed. He delivered it to me as if it were the most princely donation in the world. Upon my utter- ing a doubt whether it would be sufficient to tinge more than four grains of lead, he eagerly demanded it back. I complied, in the hope that he would ex- change it for a larger piece ; instead of which he divided it in two with his thumb, threw away one-half and gave me back the other, saying : ' Even now it is sufficient for you.' Then I was still more heavily disappointed, as I could not believe that anything could be done with so small a particle of the Medicine. He, however, bade me take two drachms, or half an ounce of lead, or even a little more, and to melt it in the crucible ; for the Medicine would certainly not tinge more of the base metal than it was sufficient for. I answered that I could not believe that so small a quantity of Tincture could transform so large a mass of lead. But I had to be satisfied with what he had given me, and my chief difficulty was about the appli- cation of the Tincture. I confessed that when I held his ivory box in my hand, I had managed to extract a few crumbs of his Stone, but that they had changed my lead, not into gold, but only into glass. He laughed, and said that I was more expert at theft than at the application of the Tincture. * You should
§ 65] THE OUTCOME OF ALCHEMY 87
have protected your spoil with " yellow wax," then it
would have been able to penetrate the lead and to
transmute it into ^old.' . . .
§ 65. "... With ... a promise to return at nine
o'clock the next morning, he left me. But at the
„ , ^. stated hour on the followingf day he did
Helvetms , i . . i .
performs a ^^^ make his appearance ; m his stead,
Transmuta- however, there came, a few hours later,
*^°°* a stranger, who told me that his friend
the Artist was unavoidably detained, but that he
would call at three o'clock in the afternoon. The
afternoon came ; I waited for him till half-past seven
o'clock. He did not appear. Thereupon my wife
came and tempted me to try the transmutation myself.
I determined, however, to wait till the morrow, and
in the meantime, ordered my son to light the fire, as I
was now almost sure that he was an impostor. On
the morrow, however, I thought that I might at least
make an experiment with the piece of ' Tincture '
which I had received ; if it turned out a failure, in
spite of my following his directions closely, I might
then be quite certain that my visitor had been a mere
pretender to a knowledge of this Art. So I asked my
wife to put the Tincture in wax, and I myself, in the
meantime, prepared six drachms of lead ; I then cast
the Tincture, enveloped as it was in wax, on the lead ;
as soon as it was melted, there was a hissing sound
and a slight effervescence, and after a quarter of an
hour I found that the whole mass of lead had been
turned into the finest gold. Before this transmutation
took place, the compound became intensely green, but
as soon as I had poured it into the melting pot it
assumed a hue like blood. When it cooled, it glittered
88 ALCHEMY [§ 67
and shone like gold. We immediately took it to the goldsmith, who at once declared it to be the finest gold he had ever seen, and offered to pay fifty florins an ounce for it.
§ 66. *' The rumour, of course, spread at once like
wildfire through the whole city ; and in the afternoon,
I had visits from many illustrious students
Gold Assayed. ^^ ^^^^ ^^^ ' ^ ^^^^ received a call from the Master of the Mint and some other gentlemen, who requested me to place at their disposal a small piece of the gold, in order that they might subject it to the usual tests. I consented, and we betook ourselves to the house of a certain silversmith, named Brechtil, who submitted a small piece of my gold to the test called ' the fourth ' : three or four parts of silver are melted in the crucible with one part of gold, and then beaten out into thin plates, upon which some strong aqua fortis [nitric acid] is poured. The usual result of this experiment is that the silver is dissolved, while the gold sinks to the bottom in the shape of a black powder, and after the aqua fortis has been poured off, [the gold,] melted once again in the crucible, resumes its former shape. . . . When we now performed this experiment, we thought at first that one-half of the gold had evaporated ; but after- wards we found that this was not the case, but that, on the contrary, two scruples of the silver had under- gone a change into gold.
§ 67. " Then we tried another test, viz., that which is performed by means of a septuple of Antimony ; at first it seemed as if eight grains of the gold had been lost, but afterwards, not only had two scruples of the gjlyer been converted into gold, but the silver itself
§ 68] THE OUTCOME OF ALCHEMY 89
was greatly improved both in quality and malleability.
Thrice I performed this infallible test, discovering
that every drachm of gold produced
■^fi^®*^^^'^ an increase of a scruple of sfold, but the Gold Further . . r & »
Tested. silver is excellent and extremely flex- ible. Thus I have unfolded to you the whole story from beginning to end. The gold I still retain in my possession, but I cannot tell you what has become of the Artist Elias. Before he left me, on the last day of our friendly intercourse, he told me that he was on the point of undertaking a journey to the Holy Land. May the Holy Angels of God watch over him wherever he is, and long preserve him as a source of blessing to Christendom ! This is my earnest prayer on his and our behalf." 3
Testimony such as this warns us not to be too sure that a real transmutation has never taken place. On the whole, with regard to this question, an agnostic position appears to be the more philosophical.
§ 68. But even if the alchemists did not discover
the Grand Arcanum of Nature, they did discover very
many scientifically important facts. Even
of Chemistry ^^ ^^^^ ^^^ ^^^ prepare the Philosopher's Stone, they did prepare a very large number of new and important chemical compounds. Their labours were the seeds out of which modern Chemistry developed, and this highly important science is rightfully included under the expression ''The Out- come of Alchemy." As we have already pointed out {§ 48), it was the iatro-chemists who first investigated chemical matters with an object other than alchemistic,
3 J. F. Helvetius : The Golden Calf^ ch. iii. (see The Hermetic Museum^ vol. ii. pp. 283 et. seq,).
90 ALCHEMY [§ 69
their especial end in view being the preparation of useful medicines, though the medical-chemist and the alchemist were very often united in the one person, as in the case of Paracelsus himself and the not less famous van Helmont. It was not until still later that Chemistry was recognised as a distinct science separate from medicine.
§ 69. In another direction the Outcome of Alchemy was of a very distressing nature. Alchemy was in many respects eminently suitable as a ^® cloak for fraud, and those who became
of Alchemy. ** alchemists " with the sole object of accumulating much wealth in a short space of time, finding that the legitimate pursuit of the Art did not enable them to realise their expecta- tions in this direction, availed themselves of this fact. There is, indeed, some evidence that the degeneracy of Alchemy had commenced as early as the fourteenth century, but the attainment of the magnum opus was regarded as possible for some three or more centuries. The alchemistic promises of health, wealth and happiness and a pseudo-mystical style of language were effectively employed by these impostors. Some more or less ingenious tricks — such as the use of hollow stirring-rods, in which the gold was concealed, &c. — convinced a credulous public of the validity of their claims. Of these pseudo-alchemists we have already mentioned Edward Kelley and George Starkey, but chief of them all is generally accounted the notorious "Count Cagliostro." That Cagliostro is rightfully placed in the category of pseudo-alchemfsts is certain, but it also appears equally certain that, charlatan though he was, posterity has not always done him
§ 70] THE OUTCOME OF ALCHEMY 91
that justice which is due to all men, however bad they may be.
§ 70. Of the birth and early life of the personage
calling himself " Count Cagliostro " nothing is known
with any degree of certainty, even his
"Count ^j.^g name being: enveloped in mystery.
Cagliostro" ^ i. - j j u i . -j .-r
/ ^ jyggv It has, mdeed, been usual to identity
him with the notorious Italian swindler, Giuseppe Balsamo, who, born at Palermo in 1743 (or 1748), apparently disappeared from mortal ken after some thirty years, of which the majority were spent in committing various crimes. ** Cagliostro's " latest biographer,4 who appears to have gone into the matter very thoroughly, however, throws very grave doubts on the truth of this theory.
If the earlier part of ** Cagliostro's " life is unknown, the latter part is so overlaid with legends and lies, that it is almost impossible to get at the truth concerning it. In 1776 Cagliostro and his wife were in London, where *' Cagliostro" became a Freemason, joining a lodge connected with ** The Order of Strict Obser- vance," a secret society incorporated with Freemasonry,
^ W. R. H. Trowbridge : Cagliostro : The Splendour and Misery of a Master of Magic ( 1 9 1 o). We must acknowledge our indebtedness for many of the particulars which follow to this work . It is, however, unfortunately marred by a ridiculous attempt to show a likeness between " Cagliostro " and Swedenborg, for which, by the way, Mr. Trowbridge has already been criticised by the Spectator, It may justly be said of Swedenborg that he was scrupulously honest and sincere in his beliefs as well as in his actions ; and, as a philosopher, it is only now being discovered how really great he was. He did, in- deed, claim to have converse with spiritual beings ; but the results of modern psychical research have robbed such claims of any inherent impossibility, and in Swedenborg's case there is very considerable evidence in the validity of his claims.
92 ALCHEMY [§ 70
and which (on the Continent, at least) was concerned largely with occult subjects. " Cagliostro," however, was unsatisfied with its rituals and devised a new system which he called Egyptian Masonry. Egyptian Masonry, he taught, was to reform the whole world, and he set out, leaving England for the Continent, to convert Masons and others to his views. We must look for the motive power of his extraordinary career in vanity and a love of mystery-mongering, without any true knowledge of the occult ; it is probable, indeed, that ultimately his unbounded vanity triumphed over his reason and that he actually believed in his own pretensions. That he did possess hypnotic and clair- voyant powers is, we think, at least probable ; but it is none the less certain that, when such failed him, he had no scruples against employing other means of convincing the credulous of the validity of his claims. This was the case on his visit to Russia, which occurred not long afterwards. At St. Petersburg a youthful medium he was employing, to put the matter briefly, **gave the show away," and at Warsaw, where he found it necessary to turn alchemist, he was detected in the process of introducing a piece of gold in the crucible containing the base metal he was about to *' transmute." At Strasburg, which he reached in 1780, however, he was more successful. Here he appeared as a miraculous healer of all diseases, though whether his cures are to be ascribed to some simple but efficacious medicine which he had dis- covered, to hypnotism, to the power of the imagina- tion on the part of his patients, or to the power of imagination on the part of those who have recorded the alleged cures, is a question into which we do not
PLATE 14.
COMTE defCAGlTlOSTRO.
'^ace page 92J
§ 70] THE OUTCOME OF ALCHEMY 93
propose to enter. At S trasburg " Cagllostro " came into contact with the Cardinal de Rohan, and a fast friend- ship sprang up between the two, which, in the end, proved * ' CagHostro 's " ruin. The * ' Count " next visited Bordeaux and Lyons, successfully founding lodges of Egyptian Masonry. From the latter town he pro- ceeded to Paris, where he reached the height of his fame. He became extraordinarily rich, although he is said to have asked, and to have accepted, no fee for his services as a healer. On the other hand, there was a substantial entrance-fee to the mysteries of Egyptian Masonry, which, with its alchemistic promises of health and wealth, prospered exceedingly. At the summit of his career, however, fortune forsook him. As a friend of de Rohan, he was arrested in connection with the Diamond Necklace affair, on the word of the in- famous Countess de Lamotte ; although, of whatever else he may have been guilty, he was perfectly innocent of this charge. After lying imprisoned in the Bastille for several months, he was tried by the French Par- liament, pronounced innocent, and released. Imme- diately, however, the king banished him, and he left Paris for London, where he seems to have been per- sistently persecuted by agents of the French king. He returned to the Continent, ultimately reaching Italy, where he was arrested by the Inquisition and condemned to death on the charge of being a Free- mason (a dire offence in the eyes of the Roman Catholic Church). The sentence, however, was modified to one of perpetual imprisonment, and he was confined in the Castle of San Leo, where he died in 1795, after four years of imprisonment, in what manner is not known.