V. The fifth conclusion of Armachanus against the friars, was this, " that Fifth con-

Christ never taught any man wilfully to beg," which he proved thus : It is '^^"*'"" ''^ written, [Acts i.] " Christ began to do and to teach." If Christ, therefore, cha'nus who did never wilfully beg himself, as hath been proved, had taught men against otherwise to do ; then his doing and teaching had not agreed together. ^'^"^ inoxs.
Item, If Christ, who never begged himself wilfully, had taught men this
(1) Ex vita S. Clcmciitis. ll') Causa .\ii. quxst. i. ca;>. 2, " Dilectissiinii."— Eu. '
7f>i
OKATIOX or AU.MAC HAMS AOAINST BEGGING I-HIAKS.
A. I). 13G0.
he liad given suspicion as hath been proved
Edward doctrine of wilful begging, contrary to his own doing ^^^- of his doctrine, and ministered slander of the same before in the fourth conclusion.
Moreover, in so teaching, he had taught contrary to the emperor's just law, which expressly forhiddeth the same.
' that our which he
Sixth conclu- sion •gainst the iii.ii
The rule of friar Francis.